DeepCover

Fatima Sana vs New Zealand: WODI record

Fatima Sana has scored 139 runs off 158 balls against New Zealand in women's ODIs (strike rate 87.97, average 34.75, 1 sixes, out 4 times). Fatima Sana has taken 4 wickets against New Zealand in women's ODIs (economy 6.23, average 62, 239 balls bowled).

● Verified cricket record
139
runs vs New Zealand · SR 87.97
Fatima Sana · WODI
Runs139
Balls158
Strike rate87.97
Average34.75
Fours12
Sixes1
Dismissals4
Wickets4
Balls239
Economy6.23
Average62
Strike rate59.75

What the numbers say

Most runs in a season2023: 137 runs off 147 balls at SR 93.19 against New Zealand.
Most productive venueHagley Oval, Christchurch: 126 runs off 144 balls at SR 87.50.
Most frequent dismissing bowlerAmelia Kerr dismissed him 2 times in 46 balls, conceding 31 runs at SR 67.39.
Highest scoring rate (12+ balls)Against Lea Tahuhu: 15 runs off 15 balls at SR 100.

Season by season against New Zealand

202207010
202313714793.19268.50
2025245012

Ground by ground against New Zealand

Hagley Oval, Christchurch12614487.502
John Davies Oval, Queenstown11101101
R Premadasa Stadium, Colombo24501

New Zealand bowler by bowler

Amelia Kerr46313 / 067.392
Hannah Rowe34334 / 097.050
Fran Jonas25242 / 0960
Molly Penfold21181 / 085.710
Lea Tahuhu15150 / 11001
Sophie Devine991 / 01001
Jess Kerr781 / 0114.280
Eden Carson110 / 01000
Full profileNew Zealand

How many runs has Fatima Sana scored against New Zealand?

Fatima Sana has scored 139 runs off 158 balls against New Zealand in women's ODIs (strike rate 87.97, average 34.75, 1 sixes, out 4 times).

How many wickets has Fatima Sana taken against New Zealand?

Fatima Sana has taken 4 wickets against New Zealand in women's ODIs (economy 6.23, average 62, 239 balls bowled).

More vs-team records

Explore more

DeepCover homeNew ZealandFatima Sana →New Zealand →

Each answer states its source and coverage. All-time totals use verified scorecards or official career records when available; ball-level analysis uses recorded deliveries. When coverage differs, the page says so. · how we verify our numbers · methodology · all answered questions