DeepCover

Maddy Green vs Hannah Rowe: Super Smash (Women) head-to-head record

Maddy Green vs Hannah Rowe (Super Smash (Women)): 48 runs off 51 balls, out 3 times (SR 94.11, dot% 45.10, 5×4, 0×6).

● Verified cricket record
The readHannah Rowe wins the tempo battle - Maddy Green scores at only 94.11 here.
Maddy Greenvs
48
runs off 51 balls · SR 94.11 · 0×6
Maddy Green vs Hannah Rowe · Super Smash (Women)
Hannah Rowe
Answer data table
Balls51
Runs48
Dismissals3
Strike rate94.11
Dot %45.10
Boundary %9.80
Fours5
Sixes0

Phase-wise: powerplay, middle and death overs

Answer data table
Powerplay2311147.820
Middle21290138.090
Death782114.280

Season by season

Answer data table
2020117063.63
20211715188.23
2022341133.33
2023780114.28
202476185.71
2025680133.33

By venue

Answer data table
McLean Park, Napier1614187.5
Basin Reserve, Wellington124133.33
Pukekura Park, New Plymouth11150136.36
Eden Park, Auckland9110122.22
Fitzherbert Park, Palmerston North341133.33

How many runs has Maddy Green scored against Hannah Rowe in the Super Smash (Women)?

Maddy Green has scored 48 runs off 51 balls against Hannah Rowe in the Super Smash (Women) (strike rate 94.11, average 16).

How many times has Hannah Rowe dismissed Maddy Green?

Hannah Rowe has dismissed Maddy Green 3 time(s) in the Super Smash (Women) (caught ×3).

How many sixes has Maddy Green hit off Hannah Rowe?

Maddy Green has hit 0 six(es) and 5 four(s) off Hannah Rowe in the Super Smash (Women).

Maddy Green vs Hannah Rowe in the powerplay

In the powerplay: 11 runs off 23 balls, 1 dismissal(s), strike rate 47.82.

Maddy Green vs Hannah Rowe in the death overs

In the death overs: 8 runs off 7 balls, 2 dismissal(s), strike rate 114.28.

Maddy Green vs Hannah Rowe: recent form (2023-2025)

In 2023-2025: 22 runs off 20 balls, 1 dismissal(s), strike rate 110.

More head-to-heads

People also ask

Explore more

Maddy Green vs Hannah Rowe: did you know

Emerging pattern (51 balls). In 51 balls of this contest, Maddy Green has not cleared the rope once against Hannah Rowe.