Suzie Bates vs Lauren Cheatle: WODI head-to-head record
Suzie Bates vs Lauren Cheatle (WODI): 39 runs off 37 balls, not dismissed (SR 105.40, dot% 64.90, 8×4, 0×6).
| Balls | 37 |
| Runs | 39 |
| Dismissals | 0 |
| Strike rate | 105.40 |
| Dot % | 64.90 |
| Boundary % | 21.60 |
| Fours | 8 |
| Sixes | 0 |
Phase-wise: powerplay, middle and death overs
| Powerplay | 35 | 34 | 0 | 97.14 | 0 |
| Middle | 2 | 5 | 0 | 250.0 | 0 |
Season by season
| 2016 | 29 | 26 | 0 | 89.65 |
| 2018 | 8 | 13 | 0 | 162.5 |
By venue
| Eden Park, Auckland | 16 | 18 | 0 | 112.5 |
| Bay Oval, Mount Maunganui | 13 | 8 | 0 | 61.53 |
| Junction Oval, Melbourne | 8 | 13 | 0 | 162.5 |
How many runs has Suzie Bates scored against Lauren Cheatle in women's ODIs?
Suzie Bates has scored 39 runs off 37 balls against Lauren Cheatle in women's ODIs (strike rate 105.40).
How many times has Lauren Cheatle dismissed Suzie Bates?
Lauren Cheatle has dismissed Suzie Bates 0 time(s) in women's ODIs.
How many sixes has Suzie Bates hit off Lauren Cheatle?
Suzie Bates has hit 0 six(es) and 8 four(s) off Lauren Cheatle in women's ODIs.
Suzie Bates vs Lauren Cheatle in the powerplay
In the powerplay: 34 runs off 35 balls, 0 dismissal(s), strike rate 97.14.
Suzie Bates vs Lauren Cheatle: recent form (2016-2018)
In 2016-2018: 39 runs off 37 balls, 0 dismissal(s), strike rate 105.41.
More head-to-heads
- Suzie Bates vs Ellyse Perry in women's ODIs
- Suzie Bates vs Ayabonga Khaka in women's ODIs
- Suzie Bates vs Jhulan Goswami in women's ODIs
- Suzie Bates vs Megan Schutt in women's ODIs
- Amy Satterthwaite vs Lauren Cheatle in women's ODIs
People also ask
- How many runs did Suzie Bates score in WODI 2025?
- What is Suzie Bates's record at Hagley Oval?
- How many wickets has Lauren Cheatle taken against New Zealand?
- Who has Suzie Bates put on the most runs with?
Explore more
Each answer states its source and coverage. All-time totals use verified scorecards or official career records when available; ball-level analysis uses recorded deliveries. When coverage differs, the page says so. · how we verify our numbers · methodology · all answered questions